Slide 1
Presentation
of Species of Study
|
|
|
|
Chrysocyon brachyurus, commonly
known as the maned-wolf |
|
Physical Appearance |
|
Golden-red coat |
|
Black on the muzzle, feet, and
scapular regions |
|
White markings on the throat,
tail, and ears |
|
Average adults stand three feet
tall and weigh fifty pounds (Dietz 1987) |
Species of Study
|
|
|
Solitary animals by nature |
|
Males and females display
“facultative monogamy” |
|
Pair bonds allow for use and
protection of a shared territory that average between 4.7 and 79.5 km2
(Silveira 1999) |
|
Paired wolves will use the same
territory, but individuals will not usually associate with one another
outside of the breeding season (Dietz 1985) |
Species of Study
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed from northeastern
to southern Brazil |
|
Typically found in grasslands
and scrub forests (Dietz 1985) |
|
Considered endangered by the
Brazilian government |
|
The International Union for the
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) considers the species
“vulnerable” to becoming endangered (Dietz 1985) |
Goal of Study
|
|
|
Our goal in participating in
this research was to achieve an understanding of maned-wolf ecology in an
effort to raise awareness for the conservation of this species. |
In Cooperation With...
|
|
|
The following research was conducted as a
part of an ongoing project led by Leandro Silveira and Anah Jacomo. |
|
|
Study Area
|
|
|
|
Emas National Park (ENP) |
|
Central Brazil in the southwest
region of the state of Goias |
|
132,000 hectares (ha) (326,172
acres) |
|
Habitats: 97% grassland plains,
1% shrub fields, 2% riparian forest, and marsh areas |
|
The research was conducted over
part of the dry season, specifically June and July |
Study Area
|
|
|
|
The Cerrado grasslands of
central Brazil have largely been converted into agricultural grounds and
exotic pastures for beef cattle |
|
38% has been converted to human
use |
|
42% is now used for charcoal
and cattle production |
|
80% of this precious natural
habitat is under some form of human use (Mittermeier et al. 2000) |
Capture Effort
|
|
|
|
O-M-N-P1 Route: |
|
26 metal traps were distributed
every 2.4 km (1.5 mi) |
|
Monitored from June 4 to July
18 |
|
Animals captured were
radio-collared and later radio-tracked for purposes of determining home range |
Capture Effort
Setting and Baiting Traps
|
|
|
Trap was baited with a live
pigeon that was caged within the back quarter of the trap and provided with
enough food (dry corn) and water to last three days |
Setting and Baiting Traps
|
|
|
|
Trigger Mechanism: |
|
Upper handle of metal door was
tied with a nylon cord |
|
Cord drawn over a metal frame
above the trap |
|
Opposite end of the cord was
attached to a small stick |
|
Small stick was lowered through
the metal barred roof of the trap toward the back of the cage |
Setting and Baiting Traps
|
|
|
|
One end of the small stick was
placed in a preset wire loop attached to floor of the trap |
|
other end of small stick was
held in position by a straight stick (preferably bamboo) slightly longer than
the width of the trap |
|
Door was released when bamboo
was moved |
|
|
Examination of a Captured
Animal
|
|
|
|
Veterinarian injecting a
sedative via intramuscular |
|
Sedative: Zoletil R50
(Combination of Tiletamina and Zolazepan) |
Examination of a Captured
Animal
|
|
|
|
|
Processes Involved: |
|
Animal weighed in a net with
hanging scales |
|
Initial vital signs taken |
|
cardiac rate, respiratory rate,
and temperature |
|
|
Examination of a Captured
Animal
|
|
|
|
Processes Cont’d |
|
4 to 6 test tubes of blood
samples |
|
Blood smears were made on two
glass slides |
|
Newly captured animal, 2
smaller test tubes were also filled for the purposes of determining DNA
sequences and possible genetic ties with other individuals |
|
|
Examination of a Captured
Animal
|
|
|
|
Processes Cont’d |
|
Extract and place ectoparasites
into a film canister half filled with isopropyl alcohol |
|
Animal’s teeth were carefully
measured and photographed from all angles |
|
Complete Biometry record made
for new individuals |
|
|
|
|
Examination of a Captured
Animal
|
|
|
|
Processes Cont’d |
|
Female animal: vaginal smear |
|
Male: urine sample extracted by
inserting a plastic catheter through the urethra of the penis and into the
urinary bladder |
Examination of a Captured
Animal
|
|
|
|
Radio-Collaring: |
|
Radio-collar’s frequency and
function were checked with a mobile receiver before it was secured to the
animal |
|
Collar was fitted and bolted
around the animal’s neck |
Radio-Telemetry
|
|
|
|
Captured maned-wolves were
fitted with a collar carrying an external radio-transmitter |
|
Each transmitter has a unique
frequency |
|
Activity level: 3 signal
characteristics |
|
“Active” suggests detected
motion |
|
“Inactive” occurs when the
animal is dormant |
|
“Mortality” occurs when an
animal has remained inactive for two or more hours |
Radio-Telemetry
|
|
|
Frequencies were programmed
into a receiver and heard using a vehicle-mounted receiving system |
Radio-Telemetry
|
|
|
|
Two-tower Triangulation Method: |
|
Two bearings
that ideally form a 90 degree angle were taken; intersection of bearings
was animal’s estimated location |
Radio-Telemetry
|
|
|
|
|
Location Estimation Methods: |
|
Area Map |
|
Materials: protractor, ruler,
pencil, map |
|
Locate II, Version 1.82
Software |
|
|
Home Range Estimation
|
|
|
Home range: an “area traversed
by the individual in its normal activities of food gathering, mating, and
caring for young” (White and Garrett 1990) |
|
Takes into account where an
animal spends 95% of its time |
Home Range Estimation
|
|
|
|
Minimum number of estimated
locations n>9 |
|
Estimated locations entered
into Ranges6 VI.211: comprehensive system that allows researchers the
opportunity to view, edit, and analyze spatial location information (Kenward
et al. 2003) |
|
Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) |
|
Harmonic Mean |
|
|
Diet Study
|
|
|
|
|
Procedure: |
|
“Scats” (Maned-wolf feces)
collected from field |
|
Identified by odor, diameter,
and locations (termite mounds and
road) |
|
Stored in plastic bags and
labeled |
|
Dryed in the sun in bags |
|
Washed under running water |
|
Re-dryed on plastic plates |
|
Macroscopically analyzed |
Diet Study
|
|
|
|
Items found: |
|
Classes: Animal or plant |
|
Categories: rodent, bird,
insect, snake, armadillo, and fruit |
|
Niche Breadth: is a
quantitative measurement of how specialized animals or plants may be |
|
Levins´ measure of niche
breadth |
|
Calculated through Ecological
Methodology Version 5.1 software |
Results
|
|
|
|
June 4 to July 18: |
|
7 individual maned-wolves were
captured 27 times |
|
2 were newly identified and
collared |
|
4 wolves were recaptured 2 or
more times over the total trapping effort which lasted 44 nights |
Home Range
Results
|
|
|
|
16 individuals were located for
a total of 104 points of estimated location |
|
Home range estimated through
the software Ranges6 VI.211 |
|
Minimum convex polygon (MCP) |
|
Harmonic Mean models |
|
Total home range area found was
19,957.39 ha (49, 314.71 acres) |
Home Range Results
|
|
|
Minimum of estimated locations
was set at n >9 |
|
5 of the 16 radio-collared
wolves occupied 74.15% of the total calculated home range area (14,798.76 ha
or 36,567.74 acres) |
Home Range Results
Home Range Results
Diet Study Results
|
|
|
51 scats were collected from
June 4 to July 12 |
|
Total Items: 146 |
|
Levins’ Standardized Niche
Breadth: 0.341 |
|
4 of the 11 distinguished
categories were found to be frequently-used resources |
Diet Study Results
|
|
|
89 of the total 146 items were
identified as animal (60.96%), while 57 were classified as plant (39.04%) |
Diet Study Results
Discussion of Results
|
|
|
|
|
MCP vs. Harmonic Means |
|
Comparison of methods: male
maned-wolf Renas (291) |
|
3,395.08 ha (8,389.24 acres)
through MCP |
|
27.23 ha (67.29 acres) through
HM |
|
The HM is based on multiple
core areas of activity and eliminates outliers |
|
MCP overestimates home range |
Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
Overlap of Home Ranges |
|
Tiago (150.892) and Jacira
(151.252) |
|
estimated overlap of 50% |
|
Marcos (150.772) and Elisa
(150.783) |
|
100% overlap |
|
|
Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conservation |
|
The ever-increasing
commercialization of the lands surrounding Emas is a constant threat to the
maned-wolf’s natural Cerrado habitats |
|
Maned-wolves often use
surrounding farmland |
|
Extensions of home range
require highway crossings |
|
3 prime examples |
|
Marcos (772), |
|
Tiago (892), and |
|
Jacira (252) |
Discussion
|
|
|
|
Road-kill Incidents |
|
None during this study |
|
Past data has shown that an
average of five maned-wolf die due road related incidents yearly |
|
Preservation of the species
requires further research on the effects of commercialization and limited
natural resources |
Discussion
|
|
|
|
Manso (151.512) |
|
1st captured 1997-recaptured
2004 |
|
No concrete data on the
lifespan of maned-wolves in the wild |
|
captive maned-wolves have been
documented to live up to 15 years |
|
Manso’s poor dental condition
was documented in detail |
Discussion
|
|
|
|
Diet |
|
146 total items were separated
into two basic categories: animal and plant |
|
Of all items found rodent
(43.82%) and lobeira (78.95%) were the highest for their respective
categories |
|
Rodent and bird classes
combined for a total of 80.90% of all animal prey |
|
|
Discussion
|
|
|
|
Diet cont’d: Lobeira (Solanum
lycocarpum) |
|
Most frequently found item
(30.82%) |
|
Primary dietary staple of
maned-wolves in the Cerrado |
|
Grows and ripens year-round |
|
Reliable food source for the
maned-wolves throughout both seasons |
Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diet Cont’d: Niche Breadth |
|
Diet study revealed a 0.341
Levins’ Standardized niche breadth |
|
Diet is semi-specialized |
|
Specialized Resources: |
|
rodent (26.71%), bird (22.60%),
snake (8.22%), and lobeira (30.82%) |
|
Value is a quantitative
measurement of specialization of diet based on a scale of 0 to 1.0 (Krebs
1999) |
|
Values closer to 1.0 indicate a
generalized diet while the 0 value suggests maximum specialization in dietary
needs (Krebs 1999) |
Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diet Cont’d: |
|
Classified as Generalist
Carnivore |
|
Dietary Habits suggest
Opportunistic Omnivore |
|
Relies on food resources as
found in abundance |
|
Ability to adapt dietary needs
is a crucial part of their survival in the Cerrado and surrounding areas of
Emas National Park |
Special Thanks To...
|
|
|
MIRT |
|
Dr. Malinda Fitzgerald |
|
EarthWatch volunteers |
|
Natalia Mundim Torres |
|
Dr. Leandro Silveira and his
research team (Anah Jacomo, Mariana Malzoni Furtado, Cyntia Kayo Kashivakura,
and Claudia Ferro) |
Slide 46